Dominican Republic vs Japan: Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15)
Dominican Republic
76.92
in 2014
Japan
76.92
in 2014
Dominican Republic rank
27th
Japan rank
27th
Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15) over time
- Dominican Republic
- Japan
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 76.92 against 76.92 in Japan, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.
Dominican Republic ranks 27th and Japan ranks 27th of 183 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 60 | 76.92 | 16.92 | Japan |
| 2010s | 70.77 | 76.92 | 6.15 | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15), Dominican Republic or Japan?
- Dominican Republic, at 76.92 against 76.92 in Japan as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15) between Dominican Republic and Japan?
- 0, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Japan?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Dominican Republic and Japan rank globally for trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15)?
- Dominican Republic ranks 27th and Japan ranks 27th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.