Djibouti vs Singapore: Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15)
Djibouti
76.92
in 2014
Singapore
92.31
in 2014
Djibouti rank
27th
Singapore rank
3rd
Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15) over time
- Djibouti
- Singapore
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 92.31 against 76.92 in Djibouti, a difference of 15.39.
That makes Singapore's figure about 1.2 times Djibouti's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.
Djibouti ranks 27th and Singapore ranks 3rd of 183 countries.
Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Djibouti | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 50.77 | 92.31 | 41.54 | Singapore |
| 2010s | 76.92 | 92.31 | 15.38 | Singapore |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15), Djibouti or Singapore?
- Singapore, at 92.31 against 76.92 in Djibouti as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15) between Djibouti and Singapore?
- 15.39, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Singapore?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Djibouti and Singapore rank globally for trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15)?
- Djibouti ranks 27th and Singapore ranks 3rd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.