Czechia vs Morocco: Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodol

Czechia
69.23
in 2014
Morocco
69.23
in 2014
Czechia rank
49th
Morocco rank
49th

Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time

  • Czechia
  • Morocco
0204060200520092014

How they compare

Czechia currently reports 69.23 against 69.23 in Morocco, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Czechia ahead.

Czechia ranks 49th and Morocco ranks 49th of 181 countries.

Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Czechia Morocco Difference Ahead
2000s 69.23 64.62 4.62 Czechia
2010s 69.23 69.23 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol, Czechia or Morocco?
Czechia, at 69.23 against 69.23 in Morocco as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol between Czechia and Morocco?
0, with Czechia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Morocco?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Czechia and Morocco rank globally for trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol?
Czechia ranks 49th and Morocco ranks 49th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the number of documents to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.