Côte d’Ivoire vs Nigeria: Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15)
Côte d’Ivoire
15.38
in 2014
Nigeria
15.38
in 2014
Côte d’Ivoire rank
180th
Nigeria rank
180th
Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15) over time
- Côte d’Ivoire
- Nigeria
How they compare
Côte d’Ivoire currently reports 15.38 against 15.38 in Nigeria, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Côte d’Ivoire ahead.
Côte d’Ivoire ranks 180th and Nigeria ranks 180th of 183 countries.
Côte d’Ivoire has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Côte d’Ivoire | Nigeria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 15.38 | 12.31 | 3.08 | Côte d’Ivoire |
| 2010s | 15.38 | 15.38 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15), Côte d’Ivoire or Nigeria?
- Côte d’Ivoire, at 15.38 against 15.38 in Nigeria as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15) between Côte d’Ivoire and Nigeria?
- 0, with Côte d’Ivoire ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d’Ivoire and Nigeria?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Côte d’Ivoire and Nigeria rank globally for trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15)?
- Côte d’Ivoire ranks 180th and Nigeria ranks 180th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.