Congo, Dem. Rep. vs Lao PDR: Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodol
Congo, Dem. Rep.
38.46
in 2014
Lao PDR
38.46
in 2014
Congo, Dem. Rep. rank
146th
Lao PDR rank
146th
Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time
- Congo, Dem. Rep.
- Lao PDR
How they compare
Congo, Dem. Rep. currently reports 38.46 against 38.46 in Lao PDR, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Congo, Dem. Rep. ahead.
Congo, Dem. Rep. ranks 146th and Lao PDR ranks 146th of 181 countries.
Congo, Dem. Rep. has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo, Dem. Rep. | Lao PDR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 40 | 23.08 | 16.92 | Congo, Dem. Rep. |
| 2010s | 38.46 | 38.46 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol, Congo, Dem. Rep. or Lao PDR?
- Congo, Dem. Rep., at 38.46 against 38.46 in Lao PDR as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol between Congo, Dem. Rep. and Lao PDR?
- 0, with Congo, Dem. Rep. ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo, Dem. Rep. and Lao PDR?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Congo, Dem. Rep. and Lao PDR rank globally for trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol?
- Congo, Dem. Rep. ranks 146th and Lao PDR ranks 146th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.