Democratic Republic of Congo vs India: Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodol
Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time
- Democratic Republic of Congo
- India
How they compare
Democratic Republic of Congo currently reports 38.46 against 38.46 in India, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 146th and India ranks 146th of 181 countries.
Democratic Republic of Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Democratic Republic of Congo | India | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 40 | 38.46 | 1.54 | Democratic Republic of Congo |
| 2010s | 38.46 | 38.46 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol, Democratic Republic of Congo or India?
- Democratic Republic of Congo, at 38.46 against 38.46 in India as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol between Democratic Republic of Congo and India?
- 0, with Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and India?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Democratic Republic of Congo and India rank globally for trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol?
- Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 146th and India ranks 146th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.