Central African Republic vs Nigeria: Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15)
Central African Republic
0
in 2014
Nigeria
15.38
in 2014
Central African Republic rank
183rd
Nigeria rank
180th
Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15) over time
- Central African Republic
- Nigeria
How they compare
Nigeria currently reports 15.38 against 0 in Central African Republic, a difference of 15.38.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Nigeria has been ahead every year.
Central African Republic ranks 183rd and Nigeria ranks 180th of 183 countries.
Nigeria has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Nigeria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 | 12.31 | 12.31 | Nigeria |
| 2010s | 0 | 15.38 | 15.38 | Nigeria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15), Central African Republic or Nigeria?
- Nigeria, at 15.38 against 0 in Central African Republic as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15) between Central African Republic and Nigeria?
- 15.38, with Nigeria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Nigeria?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Central African Republic and Nigeria rank globally for trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15)?
- Central African Republic ranks 183rd and Nigeria ranks 180th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.