Cape Verde vs Lesotho: Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodol
Cape Verde
61.54
in 2014
Lesotho
61.54
in 2014
Cape Verde rank
78th
Lesotho rank
78th
Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time
- Cape Verde
- Lesotho
How they compare
Cape Verde currently reports 61.54 against 61.54 in Lesotho, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Cape Verde ahead.
Cape Verde ranks 78th and Lesotho ranks 78th of 181 countries.
Cape Verde has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 61.54 | 53.85 | 7.69 | Cape Verde |
| 2010s | 61.54 | 58.46 | 3.08 | Cape Verde |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol, Cape Verde or Lesotho?
- Cape Verde, at 61.54 against 61.54 in Lesotho as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol between Cape Verde and Lesotho?
- 0, with Cape Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Lesotho?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Cape Verde and Lesotho rank globally for trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol?
- Cape Verde ranks 78th and Lesotho ranks 78th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.