Botswana vs Honduras: Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodol

Botswana
69.23
in 2014
Honduras
69.23
in 2014
Botswana rank
49th
Honduras rank
49th

Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time

  • Botswana
  • Honduras
0204060200520092014

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 69.23 against 69.23 in Honduras, a difference of 0.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Honduras has been ahead every year.

Botswana ranks 49th and Honduras ranks 49th of 181 countries.

Honduras has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Honduras Difference Ahead
2000s 61.54 64.62 3.08 Honduras
2010s 66.15 69.23 3.08 Honduras

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol, Botswana or Honduras?
Botswana, at 69.23 against 69.23 in Honduras as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol between Botswana and Honduras?
0, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Honduras?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Botswana and Honduras rank globally for trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol?
Botswana ranks 49th and Honduras ranks 49th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the number of documents to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.