Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Gabon: Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15)
Bosnia and Herzegovina
53.85
in 2014
Gabon
53.85
in 2014
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
108th
Gabon rank
108th
Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15) over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Gabon
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 53.85 against 53.85 in Gabon, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Gabon has been ahead every year.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 108th and Gabon ranks 108th of 184 countries.
Gabon has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Gabon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 56.92 | 58.46 | 1.54 | Gabon |
| 2010s | 53.85 | 53.85 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15), Bosnia and Herzegovina or Gabon?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 53.85 against 53.85 in Gabon as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15) between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Gabon?
- 0, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Gabon?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Gabon rank globally for trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15)?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 108th and Gabon ranks 108th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.