Benin vs Qatar: Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodol

Benin
61.54
in 2014
Qatar
61.54
in 2014
Benin rank
78th
Qatar rank
78th

Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time

  • Benin
  • Qatar
0204060200520092014

How they compare

Benin currently reports 61.54 against 61.54 in Qatar, a difference of 0.

Across all 8 years both countries report, Qatar has been ahead every year.

Benin ranks 78th and Qatar ranks 78th of 181 countries.

Qatar has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Benin Qatar Difference Ahead
2000s 46.15 61.54 15.38 Qatar
2010s 50.77 61.54 10.77 Qatar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol, Benin or Qatar?
Benin, at 61.54 against 61.54 in Qatar as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol between Benin and Qatar?
0, with Benin ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Benin and Qatar?
8 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2014.
How do Benin and Qatar rank globally for trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol?
Benin ranks 78th and Qatar ranks 78th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the number of documents to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.