Belarus vs Uganda: Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodol

Belarus
38.46
in 2014
Uganda
38.46
in 2014
Belarus rank
146th
Uganda rank
146th

Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time

  • Belarus
  • Uganda
010203040200520092014

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 38.46 against 38.46 in Uganda, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 146th and Uganda ranks 146th of 181 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Uganda Difference Ahead
2000s 38.46 23.08 15.38 Belarus
2010s 38.46 38.46 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol, Belarus or Uganda?
Belarus, at 38.46 against 38.46 in Uganda as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol between Belarus and Uganda?
0, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Uganda?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Belarus and Uganda rank globally for trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol?
Belarus ranks 146th and Uganda ranks 146th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the number of documents to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.