Bangladesh vs Mozambique, Republic of: Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15)
Bangladesh
46.15
in 2014
Mozambique, Republic of
46.15
in 2014
Bangladesh rank
129th
Mozambique, Republic of rank
129th
Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15) over time
- Bangladesh
- Mozambique, Republic of
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports 46.15 against 46.15 in Mozambique, Republic of, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Mozambique, Republic of has been ahead every year.
Bangladesh ranks 129th and Mozambique, Republic of ranks 129th of 183 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Mozambique, Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 46.15 | 46.15 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 46.15 | 46.15 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15), Bangladesh or Mozambique, Republic of?
- Bangladesh, at 46.15 against 46.15 in Mozambique, Republic of as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15) between Bangladesh and Mozambique, Republic of?
- 0, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Mozambique, Republic of?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Bangladesh and Mozambique, Republic of rank globally for trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15)?
- Bangladesh ranks 129th and Mozambique, Republic of ranks 129th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.