Bahamas vs Dominican Republic: Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15)
Bahamas
76.92
in 2014
Dominican Republic
76.92
in 2014
Bahamas rank
27th
Dominican Republic rank
27th
Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15) over time
- Bahamas
- Dominican Republic
How they compare
Bahamas currently reports 76.92 against 76.92 in Dominican Republic, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Bahamas ahead.
Bahamas ranks 27th and Dominican Republic ranks 27th of 183 countries.
Bahamas has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahamas | Dominican Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 76.92 | 69.23 | 7.69 | Bahamas |
| 2010s | 76.92 | 70.77 | 6.15 | Bahamas |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15), Bahamas or Dominican Republic?
- Bahamas, at 76.92 against 76.92 in Dominican Republic as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15) between Bahamas and Dominican Republic?
- 0, with Bahamas ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Dominican Republic?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2014.
- How do Bahamas and Dominican Republic rank globally for trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15)?
- Bahamas ranks 27th and Dominican Republic ranks 27th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.