Austria vs Estonia: Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodol

Austria
84.62
in 2014
Estonia
84.62
in 2014
Austria rank
11th
Estonia rank
11th

Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time

  • Austria
  • Estonia
020406080200520092014

How they compare

Austria currently reports 84.62 against 84.62 in Estonia, a difference of 0.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Estonia has been ahead every year.

Austria ranks 11th and Estonia ranks 11th of 181 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Austria Estonia Difference Ahead
2000s 84.62 84.62 0
2010s 84.62 84.62 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol, Austria or Estonia?
Austria, at 84.62 against 84.62 in Estonia as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol between Austria and Estonia?
0, with Austria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Estonia?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Austria and Estonia rank globally for trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol?
Austria ranks 11th and Estonia ranks 11th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the number of documents to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.