Australia vs St. Kitts and Nevis: Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15)
Australia
61.54
in 2014
St. Kitts and Nevis
61.54
in 2014
Australia rank
79th
St. Kitts and Nevis rank
79th
Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15) over time
- Australia
- St. Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Australia currently reports 61.54 against 61.54 in St. Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, St. Kitts and Nevis has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 79th and St. Kitts and Nevis ranks 79th of 183 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | St. Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 61.54 | 61.54 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 61.54 | 61.54 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15), Australia or St. Kitts and Nevis?
- Australia, at 61.54 against 61.54 in St. Kitts and Nevis as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15) between Australia and St. Kitts and Nevis?
- 0, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and St. Kitts and Nevis?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Australia and St. Kitts and Nevis rank globally for trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15)?
- Australia ranks 79th and St. Kitts and Nevis ranks 79th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.