Australia vs Philippines: Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodol
Australia
61.54
in 2014
Philippines
61.54
in 2014
Australia rank
78th
Philippines rank
78th
Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time
- Australia
- Philippines
How they compare
Australia currently reports 61.54 against 61.54 in Philippines, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 78th and Philippines ranks 78th of 181 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 61.54 | 53.85 | 7.69 | Australia |
| 2010s | 61.54 | 61.54 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol, Australia or Philippines?
- Australia, at 61.54 against 61.54 in Philippines as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol between Australia and Philippines?
- 0, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Philippines?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Australia and Philippines rank globally for trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol?
- Australia ranks 78th and Philippines ranks 78th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.