Algeria vs Angola: Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodol

Algeria
46.15
in 2014
Angola
46.15
in 2014
Algeria rank
127th
Angola rank
127th

Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time

  • Algeria
  • Angola
0204060200520092014

How they compare

Algeria currently reports 46.15 against 46.15 in Angola, a difference of 0.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Angola has been ahead every year.

Algeria ranks 127th and Angola ranks 127th of 181 countries.

Angola has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Algeria Angola Difference Ahead
2000s 46.15 53.85 7.69 Angola
2010s 46.15 50.77 4.62 Angola

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol, Algeria or Angola?
Algeria, at 46.15 against 46.15 in Angola as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol between Algeria and Angola?
0, with Algeria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Algeria and Angola?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Algeria and Angola rank globally for trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol?
Algeria ranks 127th and Angola ranks 127th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the number of documents to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.