Afghanistan vs Belarus: Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodol

Afghanistan
38.46
in 2014
Belarus
38.46
in 2014
Afghanistan rank
146th
Belarus rank
146th

Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time

  • Afghanistan
  • Belarus
010203040200520092014

How they compare

Afghanistan currently reports 38.46 against 38.46 in Belarus, a difference of 0.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.

Afghanistan ranks 146th and Belarus ranks 146th of 181 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan Belarus Difference Ahead
2000s 38.46 38.46 0
2010s 38.46 38.46 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol, Afghanistan or Belarus?
Afghanistan, at 38.46 against 38.46 in Belarus as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol between Afghanistan and Belarus?
0, with Afghanistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Belarus?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Afghanistan and Belarus rank globally for trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol?
Afghanistan ranks 146th and Belarus ranks 146th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the number of documents to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.