Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China vs Sweden: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number)

Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China
3 DB06-15 methodology
in 2014
Sweden
3 DB06-15 methodology
in 2014
Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China rank
169th
Sweden rank
169th

Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) over time

  • Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China
  • Sweden
0246200520092014

How they compare

Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China currently reports 3 DB06-15 methodology against 3 DB06-15 methodology in Sweden, a difference of 0 DB06-15 methodology.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China ahead.

Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China ranks 169th and Sweden ranks 169th of 183 countries.

Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China Sweden Difference Ahead
2000s 3.6 DB06-15 methodology 3 DB06-15 methodology 0.6 DB06-15 methodology Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China
2010s 3 DB06-15 methodology 3 DB06-15 methodology 0 DB06-15 methodology

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number), Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China or Sweden?
Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China, at 3 DB06-15 methodology against 3 DB06-15 methodology in Sweden as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) between Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China and Sweden?
0 DB06-15 methodology, with Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China and Sweden?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China and Sweden rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number)?
Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China ranks 169th and Sweden ranks 169th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China vs Sweden: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number). Statizoid. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-documents-to-export-number-db06-15-methodology/hong-kong-sar-china/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-documents-to-export-number-db06-15-methodology/hong-kong-sar-china/sweden/">Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China vs Sweden: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology)
Unit
DB06-15 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The number of documents to export records the number of documents required by law or common practice by relevant agencies per export shipment. All documents required by law or common practice by relevant agencies—including government ministries, customs authorities, port authorities and other control agencies—per export shipment are taken into account. For landlocked economies, documents required by authorities in the transit economy are also included. Since payment is by letter of credit, all documents required by banks for the issuance or securing of a letter of credit are also taken into account. Documents that are requested at the time of clearance but that are valid for a year or longer or do not require renewal per shipment (for example, an annual tax clearance certificate) are not included. Documents that are required by customs authorities purely for purposes of preferential treatment but are not required for any other purpose by any of the authorities in the process of trading are not included. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.