Georgia vs Malaysia: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number)
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) over time
- Georgia
- Malaysia
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 4 DB06-15 methodology against 4 DB06-15 methodology in Malaysia, a difference of 0 DB06-15 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Georgia ahead.
Georgia ranks 139th and Malaysia ranks 139th of 181 countries.
Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7.4 DB06-15 methodology | 4 DB06-15 methodology | 3.4 DB06-15 methodology | Georgia |
| 2010s | 4 DB06-15 methodology | 4 DB06-15 methodology | 0 DB06-15 methodology | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number), Georgia or Malaysia?
- Georgia, at 4 DB06-15 methodology against 4 DB06-15 methodology in Malaysia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) between Georgia and Malaysia?
- 0 DB06-15 methodology, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Malaysia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Georgia and Malaysia rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number)?
- Georgia ranks 139th and Malaysia ranks 139th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The number of documents to export records the number of documents required by law or common practice by relevant agencies per export shipment. All documents required by law or common practice by relevant agencies—including government ministries, customs authorities, port authorities and other control agencies—per export shipment are taken into account. For landlocked economies, documents required by authorities in the transit economy are also included. Since payment is by letter of credit, all documents required by banks for the issuance or securing of a letter of credit are also taken into account. Documents that are requested at the time of clearance but that are valid for a year or longer or do not require renewal per shipment (for example, an annual tax clearance certificate) are not included. Documents that are required by customs authorities purely for purposes of preferential treatment but are not required for any other purpose by any of the authorities in the process of trading are not included. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.