Equatorial Guinea vs India: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number)
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- India
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 7 DB06-15 methodology against 7 DB06-15 methodology in India, a difference of 0 DB06-15 methodology.
Across all 10 years both countries report, India has been ahead every year.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 47th and India ranks 47th of 181 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | India | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7 DB06-15 methodology | 7 DB06-15 methodology | 0 DB06-15 methodology | — |
| 2010s | 7 DB06-15 methodology | 7 DB06-15 methodology | 0 DB06-15 methodology | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number), Equatorial Guinea or India?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 7 DB06-15 methodology against 7 DB06-15 methodology in India as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) between Equatorial Guinea and India?
- 0 DB06-15 methodology, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and India?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and India rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number)?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 47th and India ranks 47th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The number of documents to export records the number of documents required by law or common practice by relevant agencies per export shipment. All documents required by law or common practice by relevant agencies—including government ministries, customs authorities, port authorities and other control agencies—per export shipment are taken into account. For landlocked economies, documents required by authorities in the transit economy are also included. Since payment is by letter of credit, all documents required by banks for the issuance or securing of a letter of credit are also taken into account. Documents that are requested at the time of clearance but that are valid for a year or longer or do not require renewal per shipment (for example, an annual tax clearance certificate) are not included. Documents that are required by customs authorities purely for purposes of preferential treatment but are not required for any other purpose by any of the authorities in the process of trading are not included. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.