United Arab Emirates vs United States: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15)
United Arab Emirates
88.89
in 2014
United States
88.89
in 2014
United Arab Emirates rank
3rd
United States rank
3rd
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15) over time
- United Arab Emirates
- United States
How they compare
United Arab Emirates currently reports 88.89 against 88.89 in United States, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, United States has been ahead every year.
United Arab Emirates ranks 3rd and United States ranks 3rd of 183 countries.
United States has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | United Arab Emirates | United States | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 80 | 88.89 | 8.89 | United States |
| 2010s | 88.89 | 88.89 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15), United Arab Emirates or United States?
- United Arab Emirates, at 88.89 against 88.89 in United States as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15) between United Arab Emirates and United States?
- 0, with United Arab Emirates ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for United Arab Emirates and United States?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do United Arab Emirates and United States rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15)?
- United Arab Emirates ranks 3rd and United States ranks 3rd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.