Uganda vs Zimbabwe: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol

Uganda
44.44
in 2014
Zimbabwe
44.44
in 2014
Uganda rank
106th
Zimbabwe rank
106th

Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time

  • Uganda
  • Zimbabwe
010203040200520092014

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 44.44 against 44.44 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

Uganda ranks 106th and Zimbabwe ranks 106th of 181 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Uganda Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 26.67 44.44 17.78 Zimbabwe
2010s 44.44 44.44 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol, Uganda or Zimbabwe?
Uganda, at 44.44 against 44.44 in Zimbabwe as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol between Uganda and Zimbabwe?
0, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Uganda and Zimbabwe?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Uganda and Zimbabwe rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol?
Uganda ranks 106th and Zimbabwe ranks 106th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.