Tanzania vs Zimbabwe: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol
Tanzania
44.44
in 2014
Zimbabwe
44.44
in 2014
Tanzania rank
106th
Zimbabwe rank
106th
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time
- Tanzania
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Tanzania currently reports 44.44 against 44.44 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Tanzania ranks 106th and Zimbabwe ranks 106th of 181 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Tanzania | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 40 | 44.44 | 4.44 | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 44.44 | 44.44 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol, Tanzania or Zimbabwe?
- Tanzania, at 44.44 against 44.44 in Zimbabwe as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol between Tanzania and Zimbabwe?
- 0, with Tanzania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Tanzania and Zimbabwe?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Tanzania and Zimbabwe rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol?
- Tanzania ranks 106th and Zimbabwe ranks 106th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.