Saint Lucia vs Zimbabwe: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol

Saint Lucia
44.44
in 2014
Zimbabwe
44.44
in 2014
Saint Lucia rank
106th
Zimbabwe rank
106th

Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time

  • Saint Lucia
  • Zimbabwe
010203040200520092014

How they compare

Saint Lucia currently reports 44.44 against 44.44 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

Saint Lucia ranks 106th and Zimbabwe ranks 106th of 181 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Saint Lucia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 44.44 44.44 0
2010s 42.22 44.44 2.22 Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol, Saint Lucia or Zimbabwe?
Saint Lucia, at 44.44 against 44.44 in Zimbabwe as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol between Saint Lucia and Zimbabwe?
0, with Saint Lucia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Lucia and Zimbabwe?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Saint Lucia and Zimbabwe rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol?
Saint Lucia ranks 106th and Zimbabwe ranks 106th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.