South Africa vs Trinidad and Tobago: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15)
South Africa
66.67
in 2014
Trinidad and Tobago
66.67
in 2014
South Africa rank
44th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
44th
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15) over time
- South Africa
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 66.67 against 66.67 in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Trinidad and Tobago has been ahead every year.
South Africa ranks 44th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 44th of 184 countries.
Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Africa | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 44.44 | 66.67 | 22.22 | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 2010s | 57.78 | 66.67 | 8.89 | Trinidad and Tobago |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15), South Africa or Trinidad and Tobago?
- South Africa, at 66.67 against 66.67 in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15) between South Africa and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 0, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do South Africa and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15)?
- South Africa ranks 44th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 44th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.