Sierra Leone vs Sudan: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol

Sierra Leone
44.44
in 2014
Sudan
44.44
in 2014
Sierra Leone rank
106th
Sudan rank
106th

Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time

  • Sierra Leone
  • Sudan
010203040200520092014

How they compare

Sierra Leone currently reports 44.44 against 44.44 in Sudan, a difference of 0.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.

Sierra Leone ranks 106th and Sudan ranks 106th of 181 countries.

Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sierra Leone Sudan Difference Ahead
2000s 37.78 44.44 6.67 Sudan
2010s 44.44 44.44 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol, Sierra Leone or Sudan?
Sierra Leone, at 44.44 against 44.44 in Sudan as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol between Sierra Leone and Sudan?
0, with Sierra Leone ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sierra Leone and Sudan?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Sierra Leone and Sudan rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol?
Sierra Leone ranks 106th and Sudan ranks 106th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.