Rwanda vs Uganda: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol

Rwanda
44.44
in 2014
Uganda
44.44
in 2014
Rwanda rank
106th
Uganda rank
106th

Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time

  • Rwanda
  • Uganda
010203040200520092014

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 44.44 against 44.44 in Uganda, a difference of 0.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Uganda has been ahead every year.

Rwanda ranks 106th and Uganda ranks 106th of 181 countries.

Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda Uganda Difference Ahead
2000s 20 26.67 6.67 Uganda
2010s 44.44 44.44 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol, Rwanda or Uganda?
Rwanda, at 44.44 against 44.44 in Uganda as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol between Rwanda and Uganda?
0, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Uganda?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Rwanda and Uganda rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol?
Rwanda ranks 106th and Uganda ranks 106th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.