Rwanda vs Sri Lanka: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol
Rwanda
44.44
in 2014
Sri Lanka
44.44
in 2014
Rwanda rank
106th
Sri Lanka rank
106th
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time
- Rwanda
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 44.44 against 44.44 in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.
Rwanda ranks 106th and Sri Lanka ranks 106th of 181 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 20 | 48.89 | 28.89 | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 44.44 | 44.44 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol, Rwanda or Sri Lanka?
- Rwanda, at 44.44 against 44.44 in Sri Lanka as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol between Rwanda and Sri Lanka?
- 0, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Sri Lanka?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Rwanda and Sri Lanka rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol?
- Rwanda ranks 106th and Sri Lanka ranks 106th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.