Qatar vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol
Qatar
66.67
in 2014
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
66.67
in 2014
Qatar rank
44th
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank
44th
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time
- Qatar
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
How they compare
Qatar currently reports 66.67 against 66.67 in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, a difference of 0.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines has been ahead every year.
Qatar ranks 44th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 44th of 181 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Qatar | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 66.67 | 66.67 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 66.67 | 66.67 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol, Qatar or Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- Qatar, at 66.67 against 66.67 in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol between Qatar and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 0, with Qatar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Qatar and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2014.
- How do Qatar and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol?
- Qatar ranks 44th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 44th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.