Puerto Rico vs South Africa: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15)
Puerto Rico
66.67
in 2014
South Africa
66.67
in 2014
Puerto Rico rank
44th
South Africa rank
44th
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15) over time
- Puerto Rico
- South Africa
How they compare
Puerto Rico currently reports 66.67 against 66.67 in South Africa, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Puerto Rico ahead.
Puerto Rico ranks 44th and South Africa ranks 44th of 184 countries.
Puerto Rico has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Puerto Rico | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 66.67 | 44.44 | 22.22 | Puerto Rico |
| 2010s | 66.67 | 57.78 | 8.89 | Puerto Rico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15), Puerto Rico or South Africa?
- Puerto Rico, at 66.67 against 66.67 in South Africa as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15) between Puerto Rico and South Africa?
- 0, with Puerto Rico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Puerto Rico and South Africa?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Puerto Rico and South Africa rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15)?
- Puerto Rico ranks 44th and South Africa ranks 44th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.