Philippines vs Saudi Arabia: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol
Philippines
55.56
in 2014
Saudi Arabia
55.56
in 2014
Philippines rank
76th
Saudi Arabia rank
76th
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time
- Philippines
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 55.56 against 55.56 in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Saudi Arabia has been ahead every year.
Philippines ranks 76th and Saudi Arabia ranks 76th of 181 countries.
Saudi Arabia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Philippines | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 55.56 | 66.67 | 11.11 | Saudi Arabia |
| 2010s | 55.56 | 62.22 | 6.67 | Saudi Arabia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol, Philippines or Saudi Arabia?
- Philippines, at 55.56 against 55.56 in Saudi Arabia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol between Philippines and Saudi Arabia?
- 0, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Saudi Arabia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Philippines and Saudi Arabia rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol?
- Philippines ranks 76th and Saudi Arabia ranks 76th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.