North Macedonia vs Serbia: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol
North Macedonia
55.56
in 2014
Serbia
55.56
in 2014
North Macedonia rank
76th
Serbia rank
76th
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time
- North Macedonia
- Serbia
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 55.56 against 55.56 in Serbia, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.
North Macedonia ranks 76th and Serbia ranks 76th of 181 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Macedonia | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 48.89 | 55.56 | 6.67 | Serbia |
| 2010s | 55.56 | 55.56 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol, North Macedonia or Serbia?
- North Macedonia, at 55.56 against 55.56 in Serbia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol between North Macedonia and Serbia?
- 0, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Serbia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do North Macedonia and Serbia rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol?
- North Macedonia ranks 76th and Serbia ranks 76th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.