Niger vs Syrian Arab Republic: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol

Niger
33.33
in 2014
Syrian Arab Republic
33.33
in 2014
Niger rank
136th
Syrian Arab Republic rank
136th

Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time

  • Niger
  • Syrian Arab Republic
0102030200520092014

How they compare

Niger currently reports 33.33 against 33.33 in Syrian Arab Republic, a difference of 0.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Syrian Arab Republic has been ahead every year.

Niger ranks 136th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 136th of 181 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Niger Syrian Arab Republic Difference Ahead
2000s 33.33 33.33 0
2010s 33.33 33.33 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol, Niger or Syrian Arab Republic?
Niger, at 33.33 against 33.33 in Syrian Arab Republic as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol between Niger and Syrian Arab Republic?
0, with Niger ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Niger and Syrian Arab Republic?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Niger and Syrian Arab Republic rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol?
Niger ranks 136th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 136th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.