Namibia vs Suriname: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol

Namibia
33.33
in 2014
Suriname
33.33
in 2014
Namibia rank
136th
Suriname rank
136th

Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time

  • Namibia
  • Suriname
0102030200520092014

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 33.33 against 33.33 in Suriname, a difference of 0.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.

Namibia ranks 136th and Suriname ranks 136th of 181 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Namibia Suriname Difference Ahead
2000s 33.33 33.33 0
2010s 33.33 33.33 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol, Namibia or Suriname?
Namibia, at 33.33 against 33.33 in Suriname as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol between Namibia and Suriname?
0, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Suriname?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Namibia and Suriname rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol?
Namibia ranks 136th and Suriname ranks 136th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.