Montenegro vs Tonga: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol

Montenegro
55.56
in 2014
Tonga
55.56
in 2014
Montenegro rank
76th
Tonga rank
76th

Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time

  • Montenegro
  • Tonga
0204060200520092014

How they compare

Montenegro currently reports 55.56 against 55.56 in Tonga, a difference of 0.

Across all 9 years both countries report, Tonga has been ahead every year.

Montenegro ranks 76th and Tonga ranks 76th of 181 countries.

Tonga has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Montenegro Tonga Difference Ahead
2000s 44.44 55.56 11.11 Tonga
2010s 55.56 55.56 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol, Montenegro or Tonga?
Montenegro, at 55.56 against 55.56 in Tonga as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol between Montenegro and Tonga?
0, with Montenegro ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and Tonga?
9 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2014.
How do Montenegro and Tonga rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol?
Montenegro ranks 76th and Tonga ranks 76th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.