Micronesia (country) vs Puerto Rico: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol
Micronesia (country)
66.67
in 2014
Puerto Rico
66.67
in 2014
Micronesia (country) rank
44th
Puerto Rico rank
44th
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time
- Micronesia (country)
- Puerto Rico
How they compare
Micronesia (country) currently reports 66.67 against 66.67 in Puerto Rico, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Puerto Rico has been ahead every year.
Micronesia (country) ranks 44th and Puerto Rico ranks 44th of 181 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Micronesia (country) | Puerto Rico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 66.67 | 66.67 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 66.67 | 66.67 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol, Micronesia (country) or Puerto Rico?
- Micronesia (country), at 66.67 against 66.67 in Puerto Rico as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol between Micronesia (country) and Puerto Rico?
- 0, with Micronesia (country) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia (country) and Puerto Rico?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Micronesia (country) and Puerto Rico rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol?
- Micronesia (country) ranks 44th and Puerto Rico ranks 44th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.