Mauritania vs Sao Tome and Principe: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15)
Mauritania
33.33
in 2014
Sao Tome and Principe
33.33
in 2014
Mauritania rank
137th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
137th
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15) over time
- Mauritania
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Mauritania currently reports 33.33 against 33.33 in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Sao Tome and Principe has been ahead every year.
Mauritania ranks 137th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 137th of 184 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritania | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 33.33 | 33.33 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 33.33 | 33.33 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15), Mauritania or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Mauritania, at 33.33 against 33.33 in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15) between Mauritania and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 0, with Mauritania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Mauritania and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15)?
- Mauritania ranks 137th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 137th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.