Mali vs Montenegro: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol

Mali
55.56
in 2014
Montenegro
55.56
in 2014
Mali rank
76th
Montenegro rank
76th

Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time

  • Mali
  • Montenegro
0204060200520092014

How they compare

Mali currently reports 55.56 against 55.56 in Montenegro, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Montenegro ahead.

Mali ranks 76th and Montenegro ranks 76th of 181 countries.

Mali has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mali Montenegro Difference Ahead
2000s 47.22 44.44 2.78 Mali
2010s 55.56 55.56 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol, Mali or Montenegro?
Mali, at 55.56 against 55.56 in Montenegro as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol between Mali and Montenegro?
0, with Mali ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Montenegro?
9 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2014.
How do Mali and Montenegro rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol?
Mali ranks 76th and Montenegro ranks 76th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.