Madagascar vs South Africa: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol
Madagascar
66.67
in 2014
South Africa
66.67
in 2014
Madagascar rank
44th
South Africa rank
44th
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time
- Madagascar
- South Africa
How they compare
Madagascar currently reports 66.67 against 66.67 in South Africa, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was South Africa ahead.
Madagascar ranks 44th and South Africa ranks 44th of 181 countries.
Madagascar has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Madagascar | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 48.89 | 44.44 | 4.44 | Madagascar |
| 2010s | 66.67 | 57.78 | 8.89 | Madagascar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol, Madagascar or South Africa?
- Madagascar, at 66.67 against 66.67 in South Africa as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol between Madagascar and South Africa?
- 0, with Madagascar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and South Africa?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Madagascar and South Africa rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol?
- Madagascar ranks 44th and South Africa ranks 44th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.