Madagascar vs Marshall Islands: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol
Madagascar
66.67
in 2014
Marshall Islands
66.67
in 2014
Madagascar rank
44th
Marshall Islands rank
44th
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time
- Madagascar
- Marshall Islands
How they compare
Madagascar currently reports 66.67 against 66.67 in Marshall Islands, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Marshall Islands has been ahead every year.
Madagascar ranks 44th and Marshall Islands ranks 44th of 181 countries.
Marshall Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Madagascar | Marshall Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 48.89 | 66.67 | 17.78 | Marshall Islands |
| 2010s | 66.67 | 66.67 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol, Madagascar or Marshall Islands?
- Madagascar, at 66.67 against 66.67 in Marshall Islands as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol between Madagascar and Marshall Islands?
- 0, with Madagascar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Marshall Islands?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Madagascar and Marshall Islands rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol?
- Madagascar ranks 44th and Marshall Islands ranks 44th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.