Lebanon vs Morocco: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol

Lebanon
77.78
in 2014
Morocco
77.78
in 2014
Lebanon rank
16th
Morocco rank
16th

Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time

  • Lebanon
  • Morocco
020406080200520092014

How they compare

Lebanon currently reports 77.78 against 77.78 in Morocco, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Lebanon ahead.

Lebanon ranks 16th and Morocco ranks 16th of 181 countries.

Lebanon has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lebanon Morocco Difference Ahead
2000s 73.33 60 13.33 Lebanon
2010s 77.78 68.89 8.89 Lebanon

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol, Lebanon or Morocco?
Lebanon, at 77.78 against 77.78 in Morocco as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol between Lebanon and Morocco?
0, with Lebanon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lebanon and Morocco?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Lebanon and Morocco rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol?
Lebanon ranks 16th and Morocco ranks 16th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.