Kuwait vs Sierra Leone: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol
Kuwait
44.44
in 2014
Sierra Leone
44.44
in 2014
Kuwait rank
106th
Sierra Leone rank
106th
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time
- Kuwait
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Kuwait currently reports 44.44 against 44.44 in Sierra Leone, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Kuwait ahead.
Kuwait ranks 106th and Sierra Leone ranks 106th of 181 countries.
Kuwait has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kuwait | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 44.44 | 37.78 | 6.67 | Kuwait |
| 2010s | 44.44 | 44.44 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol, Kuwait or Sierra Leone?
- Kuwait, at 44.44 against 44.44 in Sierra Leone as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol between Kuwait and Sierra Leone?
- 0, with Kuwait ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kuwait and Sierra Leone?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Kuwait and Sierra Leone rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol?
- Kuwait ranks 106th and Sierra Leone ranks 106th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.