Kosovo vs United States: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol
Kosovo
33.33
in 2014
United States
88.89
in 2014
Kosovo rank
1st
United States rank
3rd
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time
- Kosovo
- United States
How they compare
United States currently reports 88.89 against 33.33 in Kosovo, a difference of 55.56.
That makes United States's figure about 2.7 times Kosovo's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, United States has been ahead every year.
Kosovo ranks 1st and United States ranks 3rd of 1 groups.
United States has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kosovo | United States | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 33.33 | 88.89 | 55.56 | United States |
| 2010s | 33.33 | 88.89 | 55.56 | United States |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol, Kosovo or United States?
- United States, at 88.89 against 33.33 in Kosovo as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol between Kosovo and United States?
- 55.56, with United States ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kosovo and United States?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2014.
- How do Kosovo and United States rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol?
- Kosovo ranks 1st and United States ranks 3rd of 1 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.