Kosovo vs United Arab Emirates: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time
- Kosovo
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
United Arab Emirates currently reports 88.89 against 33.33 in Kosovo, a difference of 55.56.
That makes United Arab Emirates's figure about 2.7 times Kosovo's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, United Arab Emirates has been ahead every year.
Kosovo ranks 1st and United Arab Emirates ranks 3rd of 1 groups.
United Arab Emirates has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kosovo | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 33.33 | 88.89 | 55.56 | United Arab Emirates |
| 2010s | 33.33 | 88.89 | 55.56 | United Arab Emirates |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol, Kosovo or United Arab Emirates?
- United Arab Emirates, at 88.89 against 33.33 in Kosovo as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol between Kosovo and United Arab Emirates?
- 55.56, with United Arab Emirates ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kosovo and United Arab Emirates?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2014.
- How do Kosovo and United Arab Emirates rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol?
- Kosovo ranks 1st and United Arab Emirates ranks 3rd of 1 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.