South Korea vs United Arab Emirates: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol
South Korea
88.89
in 2014
United Arab Emirates
88.89
in 2014
South Korea rank
3rd
United Arab Emirates rank
3rd
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time
- South Korea
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
South Korea currently reports 88.89 against 88.89 in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, United Arab Emirates has been ahead every year.
South Korea ranks 3rd and United Arab Emirates ranks 3rd of 181 countries.
United Arab Emirates has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Korea | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 75.56 | 80 | 4.44 | United Arab Emirates |
| 2010s | 88.89 | 88.89 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol, South Korea or United Arab Emirates?
- South Korea, at 88.89 against 88.89 in United Arab Emirates as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol between South Korea and United Arab Emirates?
- 0, with South Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and United Arab Emirates?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do South Korea and United Arab Emirates rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol?
- South Korea ranks 3rd and United Arab Emirates ranks 3rd of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.