Jordan vs St. Vincent and the Grenadines: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15)
Jordan
66.67
in 2014
St. Vincent and the Grenadines
66.67
in 2014
Jordan rank
44th
St. Vincent and the Grenadines rank
44th
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15) over time
- Jordan
- St. Vincent and the Grenadines
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 66.67 against 66.67 in St. Vincent and the Grenadines, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, St. Vincent and the Grenadines has been ahead every year.
Jordan ranks 44th and St. Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 44th of 183 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 66.67 | 66.67 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 66.67 | 66.67 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15), Jordan or St. Vincent and the Grenadines?
- Jordan, at 66.67 against 66.67 in St. Vincent and the Grenadines as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15) between Jordan and St. Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 0, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and St. Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Jordan and St. Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15)?
- Jordan ranks 44th and St. Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 44th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.