Jordan vs South Africa: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15)
Jordan
66.67
in 2014
South Africa
66.67
in 2014
Jordan rank
44th
South Africa rank
44th
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15) over time
- Jordan
- South Africa
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 66.67 against 66.67 in South Africa, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Jordan ahead.
Jordan ranks 44th and South Africa ranks 44th of 183 countries.
Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 66.67 | 44.44 | 22.22 | Jordan |
| 2010s | 66.67 | 57.78 | 8.89 | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15), Jordan or South Africa?
- Jordan, at 66.67 against 66.67 in South Africa as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15) between Jordan and South Africa?
- 0, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and South Africa?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Jordan and South Africa rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15)?
- Jordan ranks 44th and South Africa ranks 44th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.