Italy vs Kosovo: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol

Italy
88.89
in 2014
Kosovo
33.33
in 2014
Italy rank
3rd
Kosovo rank
1st

Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time

  • Italy
  • Kosovo
020406080200520092014

How they compare

Italy currently reports 88.89 against 33.33 in Kosovo, a difference of 55.56.

That makes Italy's figure about 2.7 times Kosovo's.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Italy has been ahead every year.

Italy ranks 3rd and Kosovo ranks 1st of 181 countries.

Italy has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Italy Kosovo Difference Ahead
2000s 88.89 33.33 55.56 Italy
2010s 88.89 33.33 55.56 Italy

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol, Italy or Kosovo?
Italy, at 88.89 against 33.33 in Kosovo as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol between Italy and Kosovo?
55.56, with Italy ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Kosovo?
6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2014.
How do Italy and Kosovo rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol?
Italy ranks 3rd and Kosovo ranks 1st of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.